In article >, Michael Johnson wrote:
> Brent P wrote:
>> In article <V5%Hh.2044$3i.1491@trnddc01>, My Name Is Nobody wrote:
>>
>>>> It was the expectations people had of the name, the car was true to the
>>>> early version of the GTO.
>>
>>> Ya, if you are OK with a butt ugly GTO that looks more like a Toyota Camry
>>> than anything anyone can imagine as a GTO...
>>> I guess you could think that, Ya, OK.... :-(
>>
>> Ever see an early GTO? Looks like a typical boring sedan of the time period.
>
> You're the first person I have ever heard refer to the early GTO's as
> boring sedans.

Read what I wrote again. See the words LOOKS LIKE ?

> IMO, they are classics and icons in the history of
> muscles cars. I drove a 1966 GTO for awhile and thought (still do) it
> was one of the best looking cars ever produced. A true classic in every
> sense of the word.

1964 GTO:
http://www.yenko.net/reunion/SCR79999999.JPG

1964 tempest
http://www.sdpoci.com/yelo64.gif

Both plain ordinary styled formal squared off roof sedans of the period.