In article
>,
" > wrote:

> On Jan 24, 8:18*am, Scammed Public > wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 1:43*pm, " >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 5, 11:57*am, Scammed Public > wrote:
> >
> > > > On Jan 2, 2:33*pm, " >
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > Only for off-road/racing use, but still pretty cool.
> >
> > > > >http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...ROIT/120109999
> >
> > > > > C'mon Dodge, lop off two doors, add a manual trans and you'd have a
> > > > > very sweet package.
> > > > it's a pity they can't get the crate motors to meet emission
> > > > standards.
> >
> > > I agree. *But I doubt that would/will stop some from plopping the 426
> > > in a slightly used Charger/300 or Challenger R/T.
> >
> > > >Update the original, REAL Hemi with a modern ignition and
> > > > computer system, you'd have a lot of buyers wanting for it as an
> > > > option. But put it in the Challenger as a step above the 392 and below
> > > > the V10 in the drag car.
> >
> > > I imagine by the time you updated the old Hemi to pass emissions,
> > > you'd have the new Hemi.
> >
> > I don't even know if the current Hemis have hemispherical combustion
> > chambers.
>
> In the traditional sense, no. But there's no mistaking the HP they
> put out.
>
> Patrick

The new Hemi's don't have hemispherical combustion chambers?
I assumed they did. What does "Hemi" indicate then?

--
For all you know this message was...
Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device.