You know, I saw the resemblance but didn't see the perspective correctly
until I looked at your composite picture. I don't have depth vision because
my left eye is weaker than the right one and its message is largely ignored
unless I close my right eye. (I could never see 3-D movies through those
coloured glasses that they used to issue in the movies, for the same
reason.) I was seeing the wing in the rear as a vertical element leading
back from the circle but now it's plain. I guess it really does depend on
whether one can see outside the box. Thanks for clearing this up.

Max

"Mike G." > wrote in message
m...
> Well Max, looks the same to me.
> I've put M. J. Schuon's two views into the ornament picture, cropped and
> enlarged it so you can see.
>
> Mike
>
> --
> Advice when most needed is least heeded.
>
> "MagisterMax" > wrote in message
> news:YI6ri.51367$Io4.21104@edtnps89...
>> Hi Mike, I thought it was the Imperial too but have a look at the two
>> and
>> you'll see considerable differences. On the one that Marshall posted the
>> circle top is not even with the rear portion of the mascot, unlike on the
>> Imperial. I had a look at all of my Imperial pictures and the mascot is
>> quite small and not exactly like the one in Marshall's picture. But I
>> could
>> be wrong.
>>
>> Max
>>
>
>
>