Thread: MIKE Hunter's smaller car thesis??
View Single Post
  #155  
Old July 25th 07, 01:13 AM posted to alt.autos.toyota,alt.autos.toyota.trucks,rec.autos.makers.honda,alt.autos.honda,sci.energy
Viperkiller
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 1
Default MIKE Hunter's smal car v large car thesis is correct
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 01:28:51 GMT, Josh S > wrote:

>In article .com>,
> wrote:
>
>> Jeff wrote:
>> > Mike Hunter wrote:
>>
>> > > I am retired now and what I do have is fifteen years of
>> > > my thirty years experience, as an automotive structural
>> > > design engineer, designing automobile crumple zones
>> > > and test crashing hundreds of all types of vehicles and
>> > > observing the result on crash dummies.
>> >
>> > From your comments, it looks like you volunteered at one point. That
>> > would explain your brain damage. ;-)
>>
>> Mike is an idiot savant who knows everything about cars and absolutely
>> nothing about anything else. Sound engineering, insane politics.
>He probably has most of his money invested in GM, the company that just
>loves making big profit on big SUVs.

As a point of fact, it seems more vested in Ford. Either way, he's on
the loosing end.
Ads