You're damned right I do. And I would if I could.

Kevin DeAngelis wrote:
> Well, you have the right handle, I'll say that! Some folks could sure stand
> to smoke a little of the wacky tabacky....
>
>
> "Wound Up" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions
>>based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or maybe
>>you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite,
>>intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity.
>>
>>Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews, gypsys,
>>etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those "people"
>>included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only.
>>
>>So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to
>>make any sense now?
>>
>>Kevin DeAngelis wrote:
>>
>>>The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw
>>>newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He
>>>(or she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and
>>>there have been no replies.
>>>
>>>I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than
>>>Volkswagen drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still
>>>do) drive VW microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they
>>>could eloquently describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the
>>>days....
>>>
>>>
>>>"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
ngin.umich.edu...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>>>>hate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>>>>>of Mairca).
>>>>>
>>>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>>>>target of hatred
>>>>
>>>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>