In article >,
daytripper > wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:51:26 -0600, aarcuda69062 >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> > daytripper > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:51:57 -0600, aarcuda69062 >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article >,
> >> > daytripper > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:44:42 -0600, aarcuda69062
> >> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >In article >,
> >> >> > "Larry Crites" > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> And if you replace it and it goes out again you need a new blower
> >> >> >> motor.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Larry
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Failed blower motors tend to not work well at high speed.
> >> >> >Not what the OP described.
> >> >>
> >> >> Think.
> >> >>
> >> >> What Max is saying is the thing that can croak the resistor module is a
> >> >> failing blower motor. For instance, if one of the armature windings is
> >> >> shorted...
> >> >
> >> >I don't think Max said that.
> >>
> >> Really? Then what do *you* think he meant when he said:
> >>
> >> "And if you replace it and it goes out again you need a new blower motor."
> >> ??
> >
> >I *think* he meant wait and see if the resistor fails again
> >before you waste $200 on a new blower motor considering that the
> >original resistors tend to be failure prone.
> >
> >Still don't see anything like; the thing that can croak the
> >resistor module is a failing blower motor. For instance, if one
> >of the armature windings is shorted...
>
> Ok, you have a reading comprehension problem. Sorry...

No, I just don't see things that aren't there.