On Jul 28, 2:04*pm, Michael Johnson > wrote:
> dwight wrote:
> > "Rich" > wrote in message
> ....
> >> The traditional idea of a muscle car was a stripped-down product, with
> >> power. *In later years (1970-71) the muscle car version of a line
> >> became almost a luxury vehicle. *Now, Ford only knows that kind.
> >> Check out the sticker on a convertible GT in Toronto, Canada.
>
> >> $45k, plus $3000 insurance (way more if you are younger) and $3000/yr
> >> in gas means this car costs about the same as the mortgage to a medium-
> >> priced condo or a cheap house.
>
> >>http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/image/100830683
>
> > Is there a point here? Are you somehow mad at Ford for not putting
> > "muscle cars" in the hands of more young people?
>
> > I don't get it.
>
> This guy resides in my kill file because he is a low grade troll. *He
> posts the same worthless crap in the photography newsgroups and gets
> slapped around their too.

$45,000. In 1988, $16,500 for an LX 5.0 or less. 240,000 sold in
1988. 2008....? Case closed.