View Single Post
  #5  
Old December 23rd 08, 01:49 AM posted to talk.politics,rec.autos.misc
krp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 457
Default SENATE VOTES "NO" on American auto loan


"John Smith" > wrote in message
news
>>> look around your house and at least 50 percent of whats in your has had
>>> ties to
>>> gm in some sort of fashion shape or form, electronics like tv's,
>>> satalite's,
>>> computers,or the processes used to make steel applances to how paint
>>> is applied on your walls
>>> look at the big picture dumbass a strong free country is a employed
>>> country

>>
>> TV's? The ones that are NO LONGER built in North America? Computers -
>> ditto? Did you know that 100% of the microwave ovens are built in China
>> and NOT BY GM? GM hasn't owned the Frigidaire brand in almost 35 years.
>> GM had NOTHING to do with the computer.
>>
>> What did GM actually DO? GM was largely behind destroying public
>> transportation in America so it could sell cars. GM waged WAR on
>> passenger rail service that kept it non-competitive with air travel. Even
>> today GM spends MILLIONS every year fighting AGAINST light rail and other
>> aspects of public transportation. GM got WAY too large and got away with
>> way too much anti-competitive bull**** that helped demise the
>> "Independent" car makers. How? By controlling the price of steel and
>> other raw materials. Making SURE that companies like Kaiser, Studebaker,
>> Nash etc had to pay THREE TIMES what GM did for a ton of steel. Tying up
>> tire manufacturers. So the independents had to pay twice what GM did for
>> tires. Little games like that.
>>
>> No - GM needs to GO! They have built **** for decades. Today some of
>> their cars are only marginally okay. GM has fought against the
>> development of the electric car all along.GM has been a badly managed,
>> BLOATED bag of bull**** for a very long time. Corporate bullies. A symbol
>> of everything that can go wrong in capitalism. When companies are allowed
>> to get too large and run by BEAN COUNTERS.

>
> ???
> So you're against powerful corporation who have too much - and too much
> control.
> Does that mean you are for sharing the wealth too?



No John- it means I am against MONOPOLIES whether they are bloated
corporations like GM or bloated Unions that no longer serve the members. I
am ANTI TRUST.



Ads