On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:16:46 +0000, Catman
> wrote:

>Zathras wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:40:44 +0000, Catman
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> J.D. wrote:
>>>> "Catman" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> J.D. wrote:
>>>>>> She is not looking bad ...
>>>>>> http://alfaromeogiulietta.it/
>>>>> Totally unconvinced, I'm afraid
>>>>>
>>>> I know one thing: I never saw Alfa Romeo that I don't like.
>>>> My first reaction about new Giulietta was: I don't like this,
>>>> don't like that ... but I start changing my opinion.
>>> I know what you mean. I realised that when I walked to the GT in a car
>>> park and found myself smiling
>>
>> Fool..the GT was always a good looking motor! ;-)
>>
>
>You think? I don't. Rear lights are too small, so the straight rear on
>view looks too lardy, and the grill is too big, but not agressive
>enough. IMHO of course.

Oh for goodness sake!! The GT won the prestigious "L'Automobile più
Bella del Mondo" along with the Murcielago. So, in summary, the GT is
a pretty thing (not IMHO) and you've got no taste (IMHO). Even so, I
do agree with you about the rear lights! :-( Having said that, I
thought it always gave the car a distinctive and unique appearance at
the rear. The front is pretty. Like my women, aggressive and butch is
out for a car to get my vote on the looks front.

--
Z
Scotland
Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather (sold)
'Oil' be seeing you..
(Email must have the word 'Alfa' in the
subject line to get through auto-filtering)