On Apr 1, 3:41*pm, "WindsorFox<[SS]>" >
wrote:
> richard wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:57:57 -0700 (PDT), boyari2 wrote:
>
> >> It's the original muscle car that spawned all the other imitators,
> >> isn't it?
>
> >> * * * * * * * * * * * *http://surftofind.com/car
>
> > Sorry, not the original muscle car.
>
> >http://www.autoevolution.com/news/mu...he-pontiac-gto...
>
> > The original was a 1964 Pontiac GTO "The Goat".
>
> > Your pictured mustang was a piece of ****.
> > A 1963 plymouth Belvedere with a stock 318 could run circles around that
> > mustang with ease.
>
> > Personally, I owned a 1968 Dodge Coronet Station Wagon with a 383 and a
> > holley 750 quad. Your mustang would still be at the line while I was
> > halfway down the strip.
>
> * * *I think you are a troll,


Beyond being a troll, Richard is a ****ing idiot.

Welcome to mtr.




















but tell me by looking at that picture
> which engine is in that Mustang? The two most common ones have the same
> power as a 318 did in 1963. Comparing a 335 HP station wagon with a 235
> hp or more Mustang would be a bad idea, I'd still put my money on the
> Mustang even with only th 4V 302 simply because of the weight
> difference. If it were a 390 or bigger, you're hosed.
>
> --
> .
>
> "A smörgåsbord of tomfoolery" * * - * *L0afy