Dave wrote:
> DTJ wrote:
> > On 11 Dec 2005 10:29:42 -0800, "Dave" > wrote:
> >
> > >> Hell you probably argue with your wife over whose tits they are.
> > >
> > >You're still wrong. The correct statement you could have used would
> > >have been "the cross has not always been a Christian symbol."
> >
> > No, I bet he does argue with his wife.
> >
> > >Because you said "is" you implied it is not currently a Christian
> > >symbol, which it clearly is. It was not always, but that's not what
> > >you said.
> >
> > Maybe you never completed school, but most of us realize that words in
> > English can have multiple meanings. What I said is correct.
>
> That is the dumbest thing I've heard since I was in college and heard a
> Gulf War (#1) veteran argue that Fidel Castro was the President of
> Iraq. He was sure, because he was there.
>
> You're going to argue the meaning of the word "is," Mr Clinton? Is
> means present tense, which means you were completely wrong. This being
> UseNet though you'll just spew forth insults instead of realizing you
> made a big mistake.



It gets even more amusing when combined with this bit of brilliance:

DTJ wrote:
> I guess if I had little knowledge of English, I might get upset also.
> Establishment is not a noun.


"Establishment is not a noun," and "the cross is not a Christian
symbol."