On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:38:44 -0700 (PDT), RichA >
wrote:

>On May 14, 11:47*pm, twk > wrote:
>> In article >,
>> *Ashton Crusher > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > >Another rendering. *Supposedly this one is close.
>>
>> > >I like the back view. *The front view, not so much... it's a little
>> > >too busy.
>>
>> > >Your thoughts?
>>
>> > >http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...ang-rendered-w...
>> > >-design-cues/
>>
>> > >Patrick
>>
>> > ICK. *Ick on the Jaguar too.
>>
>> Like one of the comments on that page, I agree, that is one of the
>> better looking renderings so far.
>> It looks like a mustang, not like a camaro.
>>
>> I didn't check the jag. * /grin
>>
>> --
>> For all you know this message was...
>> Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device.
>
>I'm kind of worried that they are heading into Jap territory again,
>with everything rounded. The Mustang MUST have some angularity in the
>body.


Exactly, It's too ricer.