On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:15:30 GMT, Brian Talley
> wrote:

>Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:10 GMT, "Mike64Bug" <mfkoch
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
>>>>funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
>>>>efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
>>>>who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
>>>>information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
>>>>get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
>>>>in office before 9/11.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
>>>Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
>>>our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
>>>what was there to be afraid of?
>>>
>>>>>>Mike
>>>
>> Nah, 9/11 happened because a bunch of sand ******s don't like America
>> and decided to fly planes into buildings. Trying to blame it on past
>> and present presidents is a misappropriation of blame. Blame it on the
>> ****ty kook religion the terrorists believe in and *their* leaders who
>> actively encourage that behavior.
>
>This won't win any awards for eloquence, but it is correct. The
>blame for the event goes to those who chose to fly planes into
>buildings and a field.
>
>But anyone who would suggest that Bush is to blame for failing to
>prevent 9/11 is not well-informed.
>

Not eloquent? It was my best prose :-)