On Saturday, August 11, 2012 7:02:42 PM UTC-5, Ashton Crusher wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 05:45:46 -0700 (PDT), "
>
> > wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Friday, August 10, 2012 1:56:16 PM UTC-5, RichA wrote:
>
> >> It is of no value. It has raised corn prices (and all the myriad
>
> >>
>
> >> foods associated with it) by 100% over 1.5 years. It scours engine
>
> >>
>
> >> components of their protective oil layer. It dries out seals. It
>
> >>
>
> >> should be abolished.
>
> >>
>
> >> P.S. Enviroqueers; Lead by example, STOP DRIVING.
>
> >
>
> >If it weren't for the "enviroqueers" you'd be living in a world of toxic water and air. If you don't know what that would be like I suggest you go live in a third world country that doesn't adhere to any environmental policies. I have, and let me tell you it isn't pretty -- air so freakin' thick with pollution you can't see anymore than 30 feet in front of you, and the associated breathing problems. It sucks. I got back to the States and I kissed my catalytic convertors and said thank you environmentalists!

> That has nothing to do with the utter stupidity of using our food for
> fuel when there are better options available.

Well, we use oil (fuel) -- in fertilizer -- to feed our corn, go figure that.

Want another one? How 'bout feeding corn to cows? Cows don't eat corn, it makes them sick. Cows eat grass.

So more than half the stuff we use corn for -- to feed cows and to make high fructose corn syrup for cheap-ass food products -- we don't need.

Patrick