TomP wrote:
> jim beam wrote:
>
>> TomP wrote:
>>> z wrote:
>>>
>>>> turns out the old Honda s600 little sporty cars had a differential and
>>>> half shafts in the rear, but then little sealed chain drives from the
>>>> end of the half shaft to the rear wheel on either side. ???? just to
>>>> reduce unsprung weight?? only reason i can think of.
>>> When you see Honda products that incorporate seemingly illogical or
>>> unconventional methods, it's be cause Honda does not like to pay patent
>>> royalties. So, they solve the problem by other "original" means.
>>>
>>> "Honda, we make "It" different."
>> have you never considered the fact that maybe, just maybe, there was
>> /technical/ merit to that design?
>
> Yes, there is always technical merit with a particular design.

always??? gm, ford, microsoft, etc. can prove you wrong on that one
eight days a week.



>
> But what I said is not untrue.

no, you we're just guessing.



>
>
>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tp,
>>>
>>> -------- __o
>>> ----- -\<. -------- __o
>>> --- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<.
>>> -------------------- ( )/ ( )
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron...
>> access to usenet apparently never fixed one either.
>
> --
> Tp,
>
> -------- __o
> ----- -\<. -------- __o
> --- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<.
> -------------------- ( )/ ( )
> -----------------------------------------
>
> No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron...
>
>