View Single Post
  #22  
Old September 29th 07, 03:19 PM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Joe[_56_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Hemi Challenger

WindsorFox > wrote in
:

> My Name Is Nobody wrote:
>> "Joe" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> WindsorFox > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Les Benn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> lol a measly 5.4L Ford engine (probably out of a lawnboy mower)
>>>>> even with a blower will be a dog compared to a Hemi Challenger
>>>>> with the new 6.1L Hemi Challenger and besides Ford can only build
>>>>> about 30 of the GT500 Shelbys a year. Dodge will eat them for
>>>>> lunch in sales. How many guys/gals do you know that are willing to
>>>>> buy a GT500 for 22K dealer markup over the 47K sticker? Mustang is
>>>>> all decoration. Dodge will rule again with the Hemi.Well at least
>>>>> There will be lots of mustangs on Dodge used car lots in 2008.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> If you're still using the GT500 as a comparison I'd say you're
>>>> under
>>>> an incorrect assumption, especially if the 6 litre is as
>>>> disappointing as the the 5 litre hemi.
>>> So WF, tell us how either of the current Hemi engines are
>>> "disappointing".
>>>
>>> BTW, if you're simply rounding up the 4.7 Hemi to 5 liters and
>>> rounding down the 6.1 to 6, why not just round down the Ford 5.4 to
>>> 5 liters as well? Or why not call the Mustang 4.6 a "5 liter"?

>>
>> Round whatever the hell you want, your Mexican Hemi, no matter the
>> displacement can't hold a candle to Fords 32 valve supercharged 5.4
>> liter. Period...
>>
>>

>
> I don't have any reason to reply to any of his posts, but someone
> should inform him that the smaller hemi is not 4.7 litres and doesn't
> hold a candle to a Nissan 5 litre either, even without a blower.


Typical responses from these jerks.

Ask a simple question without implciation, get back bull****. I
should've known better.
Ads