View Single Post
  #12  
Old November 23rd 06, 06:58 AM posted to rec.autos.driving,rec.autos.sport.nascar,rec.motorcycles,misc.transport.trucking,alt.california
Brent P[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,639
Default Three narcs invade home of 92 y/o women - SHE SHOOTS THEM ALL

In article >, Douglas W \"Popeye\" Frederick wrote:
> "Brent P" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> In article >, ToddPriest2
>> wrote:
>>> Goes to show that scum comes in all ages.

>>
>> Now one is scum to defend one's self and home against the wrongly
>> directed armed force of the government? History shows us, the worlds most
>> dangerous criminals are the ones in government, the most dangerous
>> organizations being governments.
>>
>> Sad. Once upon a time the government busting down the doors of elderly
>> women who had done nothing to anyone would have been considered wrong.
>> Guess not any more. Now it's just a tragic mistake of the wrong address
>> on a warrant.

>
> Let's make sure the grandkids didn't have a meth lab in the garage first-


Maybe the government could start with your home?

>> This story is yet another example of how much we have lost as a people.
>> For what? The vain effort to keep someone from smoking a joint or
>> snorting some cocaine? As if it's the government's business what people
>> put in their bodies of their own free will.


> Well it is, because all you free will types freely help yourselves to my
> TV so you can (semi) privately top off, or then you beat your chick until
> she puts for cash out so you can afford to be (semi) privately stoned.


I see that sensible debate is beyond your mental capabilities.

> The fact is, if you people could handle your joneses like adults, little
> old ladies wouldn't get shot by SWAT teams.


Yep, it appears you want to insult me personally instead of debate.

> Who's more at fault, them or you?


Here you go, you have to paint me as a drug user because your low
intellect doesn't allow anything of greater substance.

> Personally, I say legalize- spend the enforcement money on the border, or
> something worthwhile.


The war on drugs, the prohibition of drugs has cost us a great deal of
the bill of rights. I value the Bill of Rights. I don't care if my
neighbor smokes a joint or does LSD in his own home. It's not my concern
how he lives his life or destroys his body. Both are his to ruin.


> But I don't want any government money going to your support or rehab.
> You made your choice to be privately free- now you pay for it.


Here you go again displaying your stupidity. Hint: My view that people
should be free to consume whatever substances they choose has nothing to
do with my personal choices. The Bill of Rights is more important than
stopping some crack head from getting a high. But hey, you police state
types like using the excuse of saving the crackhead to make it so you can
bust down doors.


Ads