On Jan 23, 4:40*pm, twk > wrote:
> In article >,
> *D E Willson > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:49:31 -0800 (PST), "
> > > wrote:
>
> > >On Jan 23, 11:28*am, twk > wrote:
> > >> Galpin Auto Sports Mustang Retracting Hardtop in Action
>
> > >> <http://www.stangtv.com/news/video-ga...ng-retracting-
> > >> hardtop-in-action/>
>
> > >> Clever, but funny looking. Profile of the car is crap. Top up or top
> > >> down, I don't like it. Can't tell for sure but I think the back seat is
> > >> gone. Too bad someone put a huge amount of work into this.
>
> > >> If you like it, good news, it's for sale:
> > >> <http://www.stangtv.com/news/pimp-my-vert-retractable-hardtop-gt-for-s...>
>
> > >Not for me, but it's not bad. *To my eyes, it looks at least as good
> > >as the, somewhat similar, 80's McLaren Mustangs.
>
> > >http://www.ascmclaren.com/carsforsale.htm
>
> Wow, they look a bit odd too. I forgot about those.
>
>
>
> > >Patrick
> > Back seat? When did Mustang ever "really" have a back seat that was
> > good for carrying passengers? A place to put packages, OK. But
> > passengers???? LOL Of course, some years were better than others.
> > Kinda like using a 'vette, Viper, or AC Cobra to carry many bags of
> > groceries. :0)
>
> > We drive Mustangs! We doan need no steenkeen back seat!

> True! If Ford offered a backseat delete from the factory I might be
> tempted, but I don't see me buying a brand spankin' new car any time
> soon. Hum, for all I know they _do_ offer one.

They don't, trust me. Because I'd have deleted rear seat if they
did. The exception: the Boss 302 SC.

Patrick