You two and this FF discussion are the death knell of this (should
have been put to slep years ago) group. Mario - you make me dizzy with
your up/down/back/forth "THIS IS IT" settings. Give it up, get a
hobby, plant flowers, get a life, but this is the most ridiculous one
person discussion I have ever witnessed in the 30 plus years I have
been witness to usenet..

Am I the only one that is saying "who gives a ****" after reading the
1st 50 of these "Mario FF" posts??

Maybe i'm just getting too old for usenet nonsense.
GR

>On Fri, 11 May 2012 16:25:57 +0200, "Mario Petrinovic" > wrote:

>Mario Petrinovic:
> BTW, fimaly I figured out about Centering Spring. It should be at
>the same value as Overall. I didn't find it before because they both have to
>be at the precise value, otherwise there is no benefit of them being the
>same. Thankfully, my last Overall was at close value, so I tested around it.
>My last Overall was 109% (the settings were 109/100/100/100), and the value
>where they both have to be is 108% (so, "the right" settings are
>108/100/100/108). With these new settings I was the first in fixed setup
>sessions that I drove today, and even did my personal best without much
>trouble. I aldo tried some non-default (non-100%) Spring and Damper
>settings, but these were not good. I tried to lower in-game (by the same
>percentage moving both, force and damper), and this is good only if you
>lower (from maximum) it by little.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ok, this was wrong. It looks like the old formula is still working.
>The formula is:
>Overall x Spring/Damper = Centering Spring.
> This means that with 108/100/100/108 I couldn't lower Spring/Damper
>because 1.08 (CS) / 1.08 (O) = 1.00 (S/D).
> But, I found out that 108/100/100/108 works well because Overall
>should be 108 on my system, but Centering Spring is best to be kept at 100.
>So, now I am using 108/93/93/100, because 1.00 (CS) / 1.08 (O) = 0.93 (S/D).
> Also, FOV was wrong (again, so easy to measure it, yet it is always
>wrong, lol), and now I say that the distance from eyes to the edge of table
>is 35 cm.