AutoBanter

AutoBanter (http://www.autobanter.com/index.php)
-   Technology (http://www.autobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissanbelow average (http://www.autobanter.com/showthread.php?t=357812)

john July 18th 10 05:59 AM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissanbelow average
 
"Just as in the 2009 APEAL study, all three Japanese mass market
brands – Toyota, Honda and Nissan -- scored below the industry
average. In this year’s study, Toyota also ranked next to last, just
ahead of Jeep.

The "report card showed the Detroit Three automakers catching and, in
some cases, surpassing Asian and Europe competitors as the domestic
brands, on average, outscored import brands for the first time in 13
years.

The Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study
received 76,000 consumers’ assessments on about 80 criteria after
driving their 2010 model vehicles for three months. Power researchers
collected responses between February and May of this year, added the
scores and ranked 33 brands on a 1,000-point scale.

http://www.freep.com/article/2010071....-Power-survey




Clive[_2_] July 18th 10 10:49 AM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
 
In message
>,
john > writes
>"Just as in the 2009 APEAL study, all three Japanese mass market
>brands – Toyota, Honda and Nissan -- scored below the industry
>average. In this year’s study, Toyota also ranked next to last, just
>ahead of Jeep.
>The "report card showed the Detroit Three automakers catching and, in
>some cases, surpassing Asian and Europe competitors as the domestic
>brands, on average, outscored import brands for the first time in 13
>years.
>The Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study
>received 76,000 consumers’ assessments on about 80 criteria after
>driving their 2010 model vehicles for three months. Power researchers
>collected responses between February and May of this year, added the
>scores and ranked 33 brands on a 1,000-point scale.
>http://www.freep.com/article/2010071.../1210/BUSINESS
>01/U.S.-automotive-brands-outpace-rivals-in-new-J.D.-Power-survey

As Mandy Rice-Davies once famously said, "They would say that, wouldn't
they".
--
Clive


chuckcar July 18th 10 11:54 AM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
 
john > wrote in
:

> "Just as in the 2009 APEAL study, all three Japanese mass market
> brands – Toyota, Honda and Nissan -- scored below the industry
> average. In this year’s study, Toyota also ranked next to last, just
> ahead of Jeep.
>
> The "report card showed the Detroit Three automakers catching and, in
> some cases, surpassing Asian and Europe competitors as the domestic
> brands, on average, outscored import brands for the first time in 13
> years.
>
> The Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study
> received 76,000 consumers’ assessments on about 80 criteria after
> driving their 2010 model vehicles for three months. Power researchers
> collected responses between February and May of this year, added the
> scores and ranked 33 brands on a 1,000-point scale.
>
> http://www.freep.com/article/2010071...6/1210/BUSINES
> S01/U.S.-automotive-brands-outpace-rivals-in-new-J.D.-Power-survey
>

I think very little of anyone who can't properly spell appeal.



--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

E. Meyer July 18th 10 03:36 PM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda,Nissan below average
 
On 7/17/10 11:59 PM, in article
, "john"
> wrote:

> "Just as in the 2009 APEAL study, all three Japanese mass market
> brands * Toyota, Honda and Nissan -- scored below the industry
> average. In this year¹s study, Toyota also ranked next to last, just
> ahead of Jeep.
>
> The "report card showed the Detroit Three automakers catching and, in
> some cases, surpassing Asian and Europe competitors as the domestic
> brands, on average, outscored import brands for the first time in 13
> years.
>
> The Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study
> received 76,000 consumers¹ assessments on about 80 criteria after
> driving their 2010 model vehicles for three months. Power researchers
> collected responses between February and May of this year, added the
> scores and ranked 33 brands on a 1,000-point scale.
>
>
http://www.freep.com/article/2010071...BUSINESS01/U.S
> .-automotive-brands-outpace-rivals-in-new-J.D.-Power-survey
>
>
>


I wonder how much GM paid for that "study".


Tegger[_2_] July 18th 10 04:16 PM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
 
"E. Meyer" > wrote in
:


>>

>
> I wonder how much GM paid for that "study".
>
>




GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone calls,
and...


--
Tegger

chuckcar July 18th 10 09:11 PM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
 
Tegger > wrote in
:

> "E. Meyer" > wrote in
> :
>
>
>>>

>>
>> I wonder how much GM paid for that "study".
>>
>>

>
>
>
> GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone calls,
> and...
>

Got hung up on numerous times because he wasn't in the "old boys
network".


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )

Scott Dorsey July 18th 10 10:37 PM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
 
In article >, chuckcar > wrote:
>Tegger > wrote in
:
>
>> "E. Meyer" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> I wonder how much GM paid for that "study".

>>
>> GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone calls,
>> and...
>>

>Got hung up on numerous times because he wasn't in the "old boys
>network".


Guys, take a look at what the study is and how it was conducted. It's
even less useful than the rest of the Powers surveys, but don't go pointing
fingers at a survey that basically asks random people vague questions about
how much they like car makers.

You ask questions that don't mean anything, you get answers that don't
mean anything either.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

john July 18th 10 11:23 PM

Ford cars being recalled for combustible materials
 

Ford has hatched a plan to combat terrorism. Resume production on the
Pinto, and give them away free to members of the Taliban. A gentle
nudge in the rear from any compact car at 20mph or more will detonate
the gas tank, relieving the world of one or more terrorists (and
perhaps a few innocent civilians) in the process. I recently learned
that masturbation is not a victimless crime. Repeated wanking to
Sanford and Son re-runs has left me impotent, sore-balled and up to my
neck in credit card debt for all the hand lotion I used.

Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B[_2_] July 19th 10 02:15 AM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
 
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:37:30 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote:

> In article >, chuckcar > wrote:
>>Tegger > wrote in
:
>>
>>> "E. Meyer" > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> I wonder how much GM paid for that "study".
>>>
>>> GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone calls,
>>> and...
>>>

>>Got hung up on numerous times because he wasn't in the "old boys
>>network".

>
> Guys, take a look at what the study is and how it was conducted. It's
> even less useful than the rest of the Powers surveys, but don't go pointing
> fingers at a survey that basically asks random people vague questions about
> how much they like car makers.
>
> You ask questions that don't mean anything, you get answers that don't
> mean anything either.
> --scott


Q: if today is Sunday, what color is your underwear?




chuckcar July 19th 10 02:39 AM

JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
 
(Scott Dorsey) wrote in
:

> In article >, chuckcar
> > wrote:
>>Tegger > wrote in
:
>>
>>> "E. Meyer" > wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>>> I wonder how much GM paid for that "study".
>>>
>>> GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone
>>> calls, and...
>>>

>>Got hung up on numerous times because he wasn't in the "old boys
>>network".

>
> Guys, take a look at what the study is and how it was conducted. It's
> even less useful than the rest of the Powers surveys, but don't go
> pointing fingers at a survey that basically asks random people vague
> questions about how much they like car makers.
>
> You ask questions that don't mean anything, you get answers that don't
> mean anything either.


Something I sort of alluded to in my other reply. My last post was
merely "necessary clarification" if a term must be used.


--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
AutoBanter.com