Atheists demand removal of Utah highway crosses commemorating fallen Highway Patrol troopers
 

"DTJ" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:07:22 -0500, "Sancho Panza"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"DTJ" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:25:41 -0500, David Long >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >ANd this is where some people lose it. My position is that if a
> >> >school, for example, allows a bible study class after hours, they have
> >> >to let other religious groups in. They can't discriminate.
> >>
> >> But they do. There have been multiple cases before the SCOTUS where
> >> schools were forbidding religious groups from using school property,
> >> but allowing other groups. In each case, the school lost. Still,
> >> schools continue to discriminate against Christians. They allow
> >> muslims and other religions access, but not Christians.
> >
> >Could you provide a couple of examples?
>
> Sure. Your local library has a copy of "First Among Equals".

In other words, you don't have any. Maybe it would be a good idea to just
come out and say it, or actually do the research to back up your allegation
and post it. But, nooooo, that would require actually doing something other
than casting empty statements around.

Atheists demand removal of Utah highway crosses commemorating fallen Highway Patrol troopers
 

On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:24:39 -0500, "Sancho Panza"
> wrote:

>> >> But they do. There have been multiple cases before the SCOTUS where
>> >> schools were forbidding religious groups from using school property,
>> >> but allowing other groups. In each case, the school lost. Still,
>> >> schools continue to discriminate against Christians. They allow
>> >> muslims and other religions access, but not Christians.
>> >
>> >Could you provide a couple of examples?
>>
>> Sure. Your local library has a copy of "First Among Equals".
>
>In other words, you don't have any. Maybe it would be a good idea to just
>come out and say it, or actually do the research to back up your allegation
>and post it. But, nooooo, that would require actually doing something other
>than casting empty statements around.

Your sorry ass excuse for the inability to locate a cited reference
and read is not my problem. Be gone ****tard.

Atheists demand removal of Utah highway crosses commemorating fallen Highway Patrol troopers
 

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:56:33 -0600, DTJ > wrote:

>Your sorry ass excuse for the inability to locate a cited reference
>and read is not my problem. Be gone ****tard.

Ok, I read message that had the cite AFTER I made a post asking for
one...

The OP said there were cases before SCOTUS.

The cite I was directed to:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36118

...was the case decided by a Federal judge.

This decision is ludicrous. And given what I hear about the 9th
Circuit, it might not get overturned there either but I think the
SCOTUS would be a different story.

Now, this was posted 2 years ago (December 2003 article). Any
followup?