Vintage magnified the side marker on the hood and it shows L-110 which is the ½-T. short-bed, I changed my downloaded photos to comply. Doby

Love these Bizzes. Thanks, André. -- Z~

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:58:36 GMT, wrote: It's a beautiful ad, so much I had to look it up in one of my books. As add agencies do, they captured the lines and details but stretched the body enhancing the length quite a bit. I can see the stretch in the mid-hood section...

On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:45:49 GMT, wrote: >>Hi all, >> In the near future I will be selling a lot of stuff, from books to trucks >> in size. I want to buy a camera to post the pictures online &to various >> billboards to sell these items. I don't want to spend a fortune on...

On 05 Jul 2009 06:28:52 GMT, Max ) wrote: This is very interesting. The reverse window in back, never saw build from Packard but 3 years later Lincoln had it and again in 1963 Mercury did it too. If you look carefully at the right side of the rear window, it appears...

There are too many parts used and the hood emblem with a stubby nose is a 54. the 55 had a bigger honker. The door panels are incorrect in fabric and chrome divider. The hatch back used for the trunk is from at best, the last year that was 1954 Kaiser DeLuxe Traveler 4 dr no. K531 build 948. The...

On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:06:01 -0500, (Zinc) wrote: Aw! guys, Please. Pick on common cars made in huge quantities. In 1933 Willys combined total production of ALL models was only 29,,819. Plymouth in 1933 total all models was 298,566. Dodge was 106, 103. I'm sure Ford and...

On 01 Jul 2009 19:56:41 GMT, Max ) wrote: Gee Max, they used the 1951 Kaiser Golden Dragon paint for their car. The trouble is, this Imperial's body line doesn't fit well. lol Doby

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:28:39 -0500, Vlad > wrote: >> -Vlad This area of the cowl is the most obvious place to start looking for. Because the windshield bracket must fit both the flat area and the curved area, it won't work on just any cowl. Doby

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:12:31 -0400, "Vintage" > wrote: I can't see but one door on the left side, but can see tips of rear seats, I think. I do know of cars back then that had 2 doors on the passenger side. Could this be one of them? A few seasons ago, I posted a foreign car...

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:15:55 GMT, "Zinc" > wrote: >> >>On 30-Jun-2009, "/\\rtful ]\)odger" > wrote: >> >>> Stumped by a car in an online forum "Name this car" game. >>> Anybody like to take a stab at it? >> >>A Borgward Hansa 2400.

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:52:10 -0500, Vlad > wrote: >> -Vlad Boy! does this bring back memories. I had this in all dark red with no padded top and the 383 optional engine. Loved the car. My now passed away father-in-law and wife while visiting me in AZ, borrowed it to go to CA...

After the posting of the Flanders car, I started to look in my own books and in no time found these 2 photos in two of my books.

On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:16:58 +1200, "Jonno" > wrote: Jonno, I finally found a very small photo of the 32 Dodge and you are correct on the radiator. I apologize for missing that photo. Still can't find the gas tank sticking out after the trunk lid. Could it have been an...

I didn't have any pictures of a 1928 Dodge "Victory Six", just a 1928 Dodge and the belt line molding didn't match so I dismissed Dodge........my bad! ;-( Then the reply to my "I've seen that emblem somewhere before" and sure enough that's it! Mike -- Never Explain......

On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:26:43 +1200, "Jonno" > wrote: >> >>"Vlad" > wrote in message ... >>> Yeah, kid, I dunno what it is either. Somebody at abpa will have to help >>> us >>> both! >>> >>> ...

On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:59:40 -0500, Vlad > wrote: >>Yeah, kid, I dunno what it is either. Somebody at abpa will have to help us >>both! >> >> -Vlad It looks like a 1927 to 1929 LaSalle to me. That rear photo with the overhung gas tank has the exact shape of a 1930 photo in one...

Beauty. But is something missing? -- Z~